Masses
Raymond Williams notes "There are no masses, only ways of seeing masses." I agree. How we group others into categories is one of the most important and, potentially, the most constructive or deconstructive social tools we have. I'm rereading a favorite study, "The First R" by Debra van Ausdale and Joe R. Feagen which is an ethnograpy of a multiracial preschool where Van Ausdale spends a year, really observing how the kids interact and the sophistication with which they wield racist (that's the first R) categories. Daycare providers and parents are appalled and always blame "the redneck down the hall" for somehow conveying racist ideologies which these good, fair-minded adults find offensive. Van Ausdale has a different theory of childhood, that modifies both behaviorist ideas of imitation and Piagetian ideas of centralizing cognitive early childhood stages. Van Ausdale argues that the young child, even prelingually, is mirroring complex social attitudes--"masses"--and observing them and the power dynamics they embody and that can be utilized in the child's own social situation. Young children even know which things adults say they believe about others, which attitudes they overtly condemn, but which ones that, in subtler ways, they support. Sadly, this is Black as well as white adults. Asian too. The kids "get" racism in a profound and instrumental way, even when our preconceptions of childhood (another "mass") does not allow us to see how subtly and clearly they understand some of our society's vilest tendencies. Her point is that, until we understand the pervasiveness of cultural norms that children absorb, we will always be baffled by how racism persists generation after generation after generation. "Masses" in this case are races (all of them), "adults," and "children." All those ways of grouping need to be seen as ways of seeing. Until that happens, cycles repeat themselves endlessly and, seemingly, without our own control or power. Masses of the world . . . deconstruct! I guess that's my holiday wish, my wish for the new year. Yes.
- Cathy Davidson's blog
- Login or register to post comments









Deconstructing science faculty...
The intolerance of people generally for other points of view frustrates me no end. But it's practically inexcusable in "educated" folks like faculty. I suppose I have the passion of an evangelist when it comes to my perceived place in the universe, but it makes me crazy to hear faculty talk dismissively or derisively about online tools, educational research, psychology, sociology--whatever it is that they DON'T specialize in. Grrrrr...
Actually I came here to post to apologize for taking so long to get back on and see your request to shorten the title of my last post. It's done now, and I put up another one that got away from me in length.
It's very kind of you to be encouraging, but I have to say that being read by such an accomplished author as yourself is rather intimidating. I suppose you got a lot of practice at saying just the right thing when teaching students to write over the years...hahaha...
Teaching science students to write is another sadly neglected area of their education. I rather resent it for myself, and for those who are still in the "pipeline." Sometimes you feel like the voice in the wilderness, right? And then there are the good days...and then I start to feel like I'm writing tripe and don't know it and decide to stop and get some coffee. Have a great weekend!
LD
Liz Dorland
Departments of Biology and Chemistry
Washington University in St. Louis
You're a wonderful writer
You're a wonderful writer and I love your posts.
Thanks Cathy...
You're the best. Thanks for the encouragement.
I added one more post on Social Media tools that I was working on late last night. Just finshed editing and re-editing. Having trouble getting YouTube videos to show up in the middle of the post. Any tips?
LD