CALL FOR PAPERS: THE DIGITAL HUMANITIES: BEYOND COMPUTING
Special issue of Culture Machine, vol. 12;
http://www.culturemachine.net
edited by Federica Frabetti (Oxford Brookes University)
The emerging field of the Digital Humanities can broadly be
understood as embracing all those scholarly activities in the
humanities that involve writing about digital media and technology as
well as being engaged in processes of digital media production and
practice (e.g. developing new media theory, creating interactive
electronic literature, building online databases and wikis). Perhaps
most notably, in what some are describing as a ‘computational turn’,
it has seen techniques and methodologies drawn from Computer Science
– image processing, data visualisation, network analysis – being used
increasingly to produce new ways of understanding and approaching
humanities texts.
Yet just as interesting as what Computer Science has to offer the
humanities, surely, is the question of what the humanities have to
offer Computer Science; and, beyond that, what the humanities
themselves can bring to the understanding of the digital. Do the
humanities really need to draw so heavily on Computer Science to
develop their sense of what the Digital Humanities might be? Already
in 1990 Mark Poster was arguing that ‘the relation to the computer
remains one of misrecognition’ in the field of Computer Science, with
the computer occupying ‘the position of the imaginary’ and being
‘inscribed with transcendent status’. If so, this has significant
implications for any so-called ‘computational turn’ in the
humanities. For on this basis Computer Science does not seem all that
well-equipped to understand even itself and its own founding object,
concepts and concerns, let alone help with those of the humanities.
In this special issue of Culture Machine we are therefore interested
in investigating something that may initially appear to be a paradox:
to what extent is it possible to envisage Digital Humanities that go
beyond the disciplinary objects, affiliations, assumptions and
methodological practices of computing and Computer Science?
At the same time the humanities are not without blindspots and
elements of misrecognition of their own. Take the idea of the human.
For all the radical interrogation of this concept over the last 100
years or so, not least in relation to technology, doesn’t the mode of
research production in the humanities remain very much tied to that
of the individualized, human author? (Isn’t this evident in different
ways even in the work of such technology-conscious anti-humanist
thinkers as Deleuze, Guattari, Kittler, Latour, Negri, Ranciere and
Stiegler?)
So what are the implications and possibilities of ‘the digital beyond
computing’ for the humanities and for some of the humanities’ own
central or founding concepts, too? The human, and with it the
human-ities; but also the subject, the author, the scholar, writing,
the text, the book, the discipline, the university...
What would THAT kind of (reconfigured) Digital Humanities look like?
We welcome papers that address the above questions and that suggest a
new, somewhat different take on the relationship between the
humanities and the digital.
Deadline for submissions: 1 October 2010
Please submit your contributions by email to Federica Frabetti:
<kikka66it@yahoo.it>
All contributions will be peer-reviewed.
****************************************************
Established in 1999, CULTURE MACHINE http://www.culturemachine.net is
a fully refereed, open-access journal of cultural studies and
cultural theory. It has published work by established figures such as
Mark Amerika, Alain Badiou, Simon Critchley, Jacques Derrida, Henry
Giroux, Mark Hansen, N. Katherine Hayles, Ernesto Laclau, J. Hillis
Miller, Bernard Stiegler, Cathryn Vasseleu and Samuel Weber, but it
is also open to publications by up-and-coming writers, from a variety
of geopolitical locations.
****************************************************
